Komunikasi Konsep Bekerja di Era Millenial: Analisis Kritis Perubahan Konsep Lapangan Pekerjaan
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The symbol of change in everything in the human sphere is marked by the disruptive era, which is an era in which activity, interaction and communication between humans changes very rapidly, especially in the field of work and the needs of human life. Work is no longer required to leave the house and must come on time at the office. The research method used is qualitative research with a critical approach. Dismantling the domination of an emancipatory spirit is one of the goals of the critical approach. The choice of social media as a place for creativity is effective because there is no filter of information in the media. everyone has the right and obligation to photos, videos and various kinds of individual works to be published on social media. Many creative content has finally appeared on social media with cultural, ethnic and religious backgrounds from different accounts. Influencers are a job that is in demand by people in the current millennial era. The era of postmodernism has changed the concept of working from the public to the private sphere. Work does not have to go to the office and meet and collaborate with many people. Work in the postmodern era can be done anywhere, for example at home, on the beach, in the mountains, in the village, in the city and does not have to meet many people.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Carey, J. (1993). The Intellectuals and The Masses: Pride and Prejudice Among The Literary Intelligentsia, 1880-1939. New York: St. Martin’s.
Denzin, Norman K. dan Lincoln, Yvonna S. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Terjemahan Dariyatno, dkk. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Downing, D.H. John. (2003). Audiences and Readers of Alternative Media: The Absent Lure of The Virtuality Unknown, dalam Media, Culture & Society. Sage Publications. London Thousand Oaks and New Delhi, Vol. 25: 647-667.
Dyah Alyusi, S. (2018). Media Sosial Interaksi, Identitas, dan Modal Sosial. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Engel, M. (1997). Tickle The Public: 100 Years of The Popular Press. London: Indigo.
Ghazali, A. M. & Effendi, D. (2009). Merayakan kebebasan Beragama: Bunga Rampai Menyambut 70 Tahun Djohan Effendi. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of Mass Communication by the Individual In J.G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds), The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Kriyantono, R. (2012). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi: Disertai Contoh Praktis Riset Media, Publi Relations, Advertising, Komunikasi Organisasi, Komunikasi Pemasaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prena Media.
Littlejohn, Stephen W. dan Foss, Karen A. (2009). Teori Komunikasi (Terjemahan Muhammad Yusuf Hamdan). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Martin, William J. (1995). The Global Information Society, Hampshire: Aslib Gower. Maryati,K & Suryawati,J. 2003. Sosiologi 1. Jakarta: Erlangga
McQuail, D., Blumler, J.G., & Brown, J.R. (1972). The Television Audience: A Revised Perspective. In D. McQuail (Ed), Sociology of Mass Communication. Middlesex, England: Penguin.
Moleong, Lexy J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Paloma, Margaret M. (2004). Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Scott, C.J. (2000). Senjatanya Orang-orang yang Kalah. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
Sobur, A. (2014). Ensiklopedia Komunikasi. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Sullivan, Tim, et al. (1994). Key Concept in Communication and Cultural Studies, Second Edition. London: Routledge.
Vorderer, P., Wulff, H.J., & Friedrichsen, M. (Eds). (1996). Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoritical Analysis, and Empirical Explorations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Wood, Andrew F. & Smith, Matthew J. (2005). Online Communication: Linking Technology, Identity, and Culture. United States of America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Zillmann, D. (1994). Mechanism of Emotional Involvement With Drama. Poetics, 23, 33-51.
Zillmann, D. (1996a). The Psychology of Suspense In Dramatic Exposition. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrischen (Eds), Suspense: conceptualizations, theoritical analysis, and empirical explorations (p: 199-231).